Green shape of China by BUMIPUTRA on Pixabay

Assessing China’s ‘Green Wall’: Lessons To The World On Afforestation 

The winds of the Gobi desert are fierce and engulfing, advancing swiftly from the northern regions of China and sweeping south into the heart of the country. With it, fertile land, towns and entire communities are being consumed by the large swathes of sand, with an estimated 400 million people being affected [1]. This process, by and large, is known as desertification and is becoming an existential threat to China and many parts of the world. 

To combat this, China has embarked on an ambitious programme to plant thousands, if not millions, of trees to stop this, in the hope that the trees will act as a barrier – or a ‘green wall’ – between civilisation and the desert. Planting trees and vegetation where there were previously none is known as afforestation and is becoming an increasingly powerful tool to combat climate change and its associated risks. This is because trees absorb carbon dioxide, a climate-warming greenhouse gas, and provide a plethora of additional benefits such as combating soil erosion.

This article gives an overview of China’s desertification problem and why it is happening, the ‘green wall’, and what this could teach the rest of the world for successfully implementing afforestation projects.

China’s desert issue

The cause of desertification in China is multi-faceted. A combination of natural and human factors are at play, although it is becoming increasingly apparent that human activities, causing a changing climate, have exacerbated the problem. Regarding natural causes, desertification is often associated with varying climatic and weather patterns which can increase wind speed and erosion and, as a result, increase desertification [1]. However, China’s exponential rise in population has put enormous pressure on resources, the increased consumption harming the land and creating the conditions for the desert to sweep in.

Deforestation is a key cause of much of China’s desertification and indeed the cause for many other countries suffering from the same issue. The rapid development of China during the early stages of the 20th century saw substantial amounts of forests cleared for timber and for conversion to agricultural land. Though this helped catalyse the country into economic prosperity, it left behind a serious environmental scar. 

The removal of the native trees has additional dire consequences such as water insecurity, soil erosion and decreased biodiversity. Furthermore, China’s need to feed more mouths has increased the amount of cattle-rearing which, in turn, has caused land degradation and an increase of desertification. Overall, more resources are being taken than can be naturally replenished, creating an ecological deficit.

Desert sand by Nici Keil on Pixabay
Desert sand by Nici Keil on Pixabay

The Great Green Fight Back 

China has identified planting trees as the primary solution to its desertification problem. Though some action was taken prior, 1978 was a definitive year that marked the beginning of the ‘Great Green Wall’. 

Known officially as the Three-North Shelterbelt Project (the Three-North refers to the three northern regions of China in which the project takes place), the Chinese state has invested hugely – approximately 7129 million dollars – in planting millions of trees along the northern border to stop the encroaching desert and its devastating impacts. The project is proposed to end in 2050, with the aim of increasing forest cover from 5% to 15% [1]. 

Increasing tree coverage helps to stabilise water resources, absorb carbon dioxide and provide local people with sustainably sourced resources such as timber and other forest products (e.g.  fruit).

The results of the project so far have been mixed and are dependent on the source of information and certain factors of the operation. 

A mixed bag of results

Overall, has the Green Wall increased the coverage of trees? Yes. Has the Green Wall stopped desertification? Somewhat. When analysing the project, it has certainly had huge benefits along with some drawbacks. 

Of course the increase of forest coverage has to be one of the primary successes of the Three-North Shelterbelt Project. Where once rows of dunes were a common sight, in many places now are rows of trees. Images from NASA confirm this, claiming China and India are the two biggest contributors to a greener planet compared to 20 years ago [1]. 

The mass tree planting has had positive impacts regarding China’s carbon emissions. As the world’s largest emitter, China has an obligation to address its damaging practices – and many officials believe that the afforestation it has undertaken is doing just that [1]. The substantial increase in forest coverage is acting as an effective ‘carbon sink’, whereby the area is absorbing more carbon than it emits. (Although as the trees mature, they will eventually absorb less).

Whether the project has achieved the main goal – stopping the advancing desert – is less clear. The Chinese State Forestry Administration claims that the desert has shrunk since 1999 and the occurrence of sandstorms has decreased by 20% [2].

However, the project has had many critics that claim the trees planted are often neglected, therefore die, or are not native the area, absorbing too much water in an already water-scarce environment. Furthermore, many have accused China of simply planting tree monocultures to fulfil targets rather than benefiting the environment, biodiversity and local people.

Lessons to the world 

China’s ambitious undertaking of afforestation is a real-life case study that other countries can cite. The successes, failures, practicalities and timeframes all offer invaluable information that can help other states or organisations achieve effective afforestation projects. 

Below are just a few lessons from China’s Green Wall project:

  1. Quality not quantity. The species of tree is fundamental in afforestation projects. Native trees are far more favourable than monoculture plantations or tree farms, as they provide benefits to wildlife and are suited to growing in the soil. This isn’t to say that monocultures are completely redundant as they can absorb a large amount of carbon as they grow, however, in the example of the Green Wall, many non-native trees simply died or compromised water resources. Successful afforestation schemes therefore will put native trees at centre stage.
  1. People, people, people. The story of the Three-North Shelterbelt Project is filled with individuals, families and communities planting trees to protect their land and aid biodiversity. The Wang family in the north of China, relentlessly planting trees for generations, is just one of many examples. Effective afforestation engages local people and listens to their needs. Of course, they have relevant knowledge that should be respected when formulating policy and implementing schemes. 
  1. Plant or restore? Before any project commences, it should be established whether new trees need to be planted or whether degraded forests can be left alone to  grow naturally. Substantial evidence shows that allowing areas to repair themselves could provide better ecological benefits [2]. Sometimes, however, an area could be too damaged to repair, requiring intervention. 
  1. Context is key. Overall, to incorporate the above lessons, the context of the area is essential. The people, trees, wildlife, policy and suitability are key when carrying out afforestation projects and thorough assessment needs to be conducted prior to commencement.


Jordan Cole

Subscribe to our blog

Want to stay right up-to-date with what’s happening? We can notify you by email when we post a new article or let you know which articles we’ve published at the end of the week. What to expect: If you wish to withdraw your consent and stop hearing from us, simply click the unsubscribe link at the bottom of every email we send, or contact us at [email protected]. We value and respect your personal data and privacy. To view our privacy policy, please click here. By submitting this form, you agree that we may process your information in accordance with these terms.

Daily Weekly

Marketing permission: I give my consent to to be in touch with me via email using the information I have provided in this form for the purpose of news, updates and marketing.

Skip to content